'Eyes for Lies' reminds me of a gypsy fortune teller, always feeling the ground and then giving her/his 'expert' opinion. The McCanns for instance, were telling the truth BUT Robert Murat was not. Eyes for Lies knows nothing of a paedophile statement kept back from the investigation, or the fact there is a blue sports bag missing, it disappeared the same time as Maddie, Gerry McCann was seen with this bag the afternoon Maddie vanished, McCann denies he ever owned such a bag BUT there are witnesses. The cots, seen by the cleaner May 2nd in separate rooms only to be moved May 3rd , placed together in the room the parents claim Maddie was stolen from. A cadaver dog indicated to the missing childs mothers clothing and several other items ? AND Eyes for Lies insists they are innocent.'Eyes For Lies' wishes to now opinion on Amanda Knox he /she has a vote poll on their blog 'asking' (or gauging before responding) ...'was justice served ' ? the response at the moment is roughly 50/50 with a few non thinkers or 'don't knows' so like ALL good fortune tellers Eyes For Lies gives a 50/50 response...
